Guangying Chen, Hongxia Gao, Kaiyun Fu, Haiyan Zhang, Zhiwu Liang, Paitoon Tontiwachwuthikul. An improved correlation to determine minimum miscibility pressure of CO2–oil system. Green Energy&Environment, 2020, 5(1): 97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.gee.2018.12.003
Citation: Guangying Chen, Hongxia Gao, Kaiyun Fu, Haiyan Zhang, Zhiwu Liang, Paitoon Tontiwachwuthikul. An improved correlation to determine minimum miscibility pressure of CO2–oil system. Green Energy&Environment, 2020, 5(1): 97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.gee.2018.12.003

An improved correlation to determine minimum miscibility pressure of CO2–oil system

doi: 10.1016/j.gee.2018.12.003
  • An accurate and reliable estimation of minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) of CO2–oil system is a critical task for the design and implementation of CO2 miscible displacement process. In this study, an improved CO2–oil MMP correlation was developed to predict the MMP values for both pure and impure CO2 injection cases based on ten influential factors, i.e. reservoir temperature (TR), molecular weight of C7+ oil components (MW), mole fraction of volatile oil components (xvol), mole fraction of C2C4 oil components (x), mole fraction of C5C6 oil components (x), and the gas stream mole fractions of CO2 (y), H2S (yS), C1 (y), hydrocarbons (yHC) and N2 (y). The accuracy of the improved correlation was evaluated against experimental data reported in literature concurrently with those estimated by several renowned correlations. It was found that the improved correlation provided higher prediction accuracy and consistency with literature experimental data than other literature correlations. In addition, the predictive capability of the improved correlation was further validated by predicting an experimentally measured CO2–oil MMP data, and it showed an accurate result with the absolute deviation of 4.15%. Besides, the differential analysis of the improved correlation was analyzed to estimate the impact of parameters uncertainty in the original MMP data on the calculated results. Also, sensitivity analysis was performed to analyze the influence of each parameter on MMP qualitatively and quantitatively. The results revealed that the increase ofx, x and yS lead to the decrease of MMP, while the increase of TR, MW, xvol, y, y, yHC and y tend to increase the MMP. Overall, the relevance of each parameter with MMP follows the order of TR > x > MW > xvol > yS > yHC > y > y > y > x.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    M.Al-Ajmi, O.Alomair, A.Elsharkawy
    [2]
    D.J.Graue, E.Zana J. Petrol. Technol., 33 (1981),pp. 1312-1318
    [3]
    R.L.Henry, R.S.Metcalfe SPE J., 23 (1983),pp. 595-601
    [4]
    L.Holm, V.Josendal J. Petrol. Technol., 26 (1974),pp. 1427-1438
    [5]
    X.Wang, Q.Yuan, S.Wang, et al.
    [6]
    C.Cronquist US DOE Ann. Symp., 1 (1978),pp. 28-30
    [7]
    R.M.Dicharry, T.Perryman, J.Ronquille J. Petrol. Technol., 25 (1973),pp. 1309-1318
    [8]
    J.Rathmell, F.Stalkup, R.Hassinger
    [9]
    F.Torabi, F.A.Qazvini, A.Kavousi, et al. Fuel, 93 (2012),pp. 443-453
    [10]
    X.Wang, J.Ma, R.Gao, et al.
    [11]
    W.Yellig, R.Metcalfe J. Petrol. Technol., 32 (1980),pp. 160-168
    [12]
    A.M.Elsharkawy, F.H.Poettmann, R.L.Christiansen Energy Fuel., 10 (1996),pp. 443-449
    [13]
    F.Thomas, X.Zhou, D.Bennion, et al. J. Can. Pet. Technol., 33 (1994),pp. 17-26
    [14]
    R.L.Christiansen, H.K.Haines SPE Reservoir Eng., 2 (1987),pp. 523-527
    [15]
    M.Dong, S.Huang, S.B.Dyer, et al. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng., 31 (2001),pp. 13-22
    [16]
    F.M.OrrJr., K.Jessen Fluid Phase Equil., 255 (2007),pp. 99-109
    [17]
    A.Abedini, N.Mosavat, F.Torabi Energy Technol., 2 (2014),pp. 431-439
    [18]
    N.Mungan J. Can. Pet. Technol., 20 (1981),pp. 87-92
    [19]
    F.M.OrrJr., R.T.Johns, B.Dindoruk SPE Reservoir Eng., 8 (1993),pp. 135-142
    [20]
    T.Ahmed
    [21]
    E.Benmekki, G.Mansoori SPE Reservoir Eng., 3 (1988),pp. 559-564
    [22]
    K.Nasrifar, M.Moshfeghian J. Petrol. Sci. Eng., 42 (2004),pp. 223-234
    [23]
    R.Alston, G.Kokolis, C.James SPE J., 25 (1985),pp. 268-274
    [24]
    B.Eakin, F.Mitch
    [25]
    H.Li, J.Qin, D.Yang Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 51 (2012),pp. 3516-3523
    [26]
    E.M.Shokir J. Petrol. Sci. Eng., 58 (2007),pp. 173-185
    [27]
    H.Yuan, R.T.Johns, A.M.Egwuenu, et al. SPE Reservoir Eval. Eng., 8 (2005),pp. 418-425
    [28]
    H.Sayyad, A.K.Manshad, H.Rostami Fuel, 116 (2014),pp. 625-633
    [29]
    Y.Huang, G.Huang, M.Dong, et al. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng., 37 (2003),pp. 83-95
    [30]
    M.K.Emera, H.K.Sarma J. Petrol. Sci. Eng., 46 (2005),pp. 37-52
    [31]
    G.Chen, K.Fu, Z.Liang, et al. Fuel, 126 (2014),pp. 202-212
    [32]
    O.Glass SPE J., 25 (1985),pp. 927-934
    [33]
    F.M.OrrJr., C.M.Jensen SPE J., 24 (1984),pp. 485-497
    [34]
    H.Sebastian, R.Wenger, T.Renner J. Petrol. Technol., 37 (1985),pp. 2076-2082
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (116) PDF downloads(18) Cited by()
    Proportional views

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return